cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Giacomo Pati <giac...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r367714 - in /cocoon/trunk/cocoon-template: ./ pom.xml src/ src/main/ src/test/
Date Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:50:29 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Jorg Heymans wrote:

> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:22:24 +0100
> From: Jorg Heymans <jh@domek.be>
> Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r367714 - in /cocoon/trunk/cocoon-template: ./
>     pom.xml src/ src/main/ src/test/
> 
>
> Giacomo Pati wrote:
>
>>
>> Should this distinction be on the groupId?
>> Isn't the groupId just saying that all stuff in it belongs to the same
>> project?
>>
>
>
> I had a discussion a while ago with Brett Porter about this when i was
> converting excalibur. Outcome was that ideally a groupId points to the
> root package of that module's sources, but ofcourse practically this is
> not always viable. So it's not only an indication of which project a
> module belongs to, it can also express something about the
> submodule/project/logical grouping within the application.
>
> The maven guys haven't nailed down the exact semantics of the groupId
> yet and they are aware of this. So let's not worry about it too much for
> now, we can always change it later.

Don't we need to decided that before a first release of 2.2?
Is it wise to release a block into different groupIds?

- -- 
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDxPEGLNdJvZjjVZARAv22AKC4RFb5lSoCfoqIAQ68QYkxaO+n3ACgqzcF
5CFhnUXnrIGFcq64CnAWAig=
=DFje
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message