cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Giacomo Pati <giac...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r367382 - in /cocoon/trunk/lib: core/jetty-jmx-5.1.8.jar core/mx4j-3.0.1.jar core/mx4j-jmx-3.0.1.jar jars.xml
Date Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:38:38 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:

> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:58:59 +0100
> From: Daniel Fagerstrom <danielf@nada.kth.se>
> Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r367382 - in /cocoon/trunk/lib:
>     core/jetty-jmx-5.1.8.jar   core/mx4j-3.0.1.jar core/mx4j-jmx-3.0.1.jar
>     jars.xml
> 
> Jorg Heymans skrev:
>>  giacomo@apache.org wrote:
>> 
>> > Author: giacomo
>> > Date: Mon Jan  9 12:12:17 2006
>> > New Revision: 367382
>> > 
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=367382&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > try to fix issues with JMX but couldn't test it as current build.sh isn't 
>> > working for a full build
>>
>>  build.sh is broken because of the repository flattening.
>>
>>  I'm wondering actually how long we should still keep trunk/lib around.
>>  It can confuse people into thinking that this way of building is
>>  still/will still be supported.
>
> I would prefer removing the trunk/lib and Ant build system ASAP, and that 
> everybody helps getting the parts they care for working with the Maven build.

Yes, ASAP!

- -- 
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDwtffLNdJvZjjVZARAoWUAKDh2gUx6psdcAQuKLgLm0ynO9TffwCgkUyA
7DPqCmR50ih5DISYSqOfxzs=
=ggGP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message