cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antonio Gallardo <agalla...@agssa.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] green light for flattening repo structure in trunk
Date Thu, 05 Jan 2006 17:24:40 GMT
Jorg Heymans wrote:

>Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>  
>
>>Jorg Heymans wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>[ +1 ] flatten the structure and pave the way for a 2.2 release
>>>      
>>>
>>
>>Minor point: does it have to be 'cocoon-core', 'cocoon-webapp',
>>'cocoon-<blockname>'; could it be 'core', 'webapp', 'block-<blockname>'?
>>Not sure it will be easy to navigate among all those 'cocoon-foo's :)
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Matching the directory name with the artifactId is recommended practice.
>I can't exactly remember the benefits, but i know it saves extra
>configuration in reactor builds eg when using continuum.
>  
>
Should not be due name collision. ie: a core.jar released in another 
project?
Yes, I will prefer to keep a prefixed name as cocoon-core.jar. No matter 
where we find this file, his names states it is the cocoon core.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo.


Mime
View raw message