cocoon-dev mailing list archives: December 2005

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Jean-Christophe Kermagoret [Portal] Coplet instance pool Thu, 01 Dec, 08:10
Ralph Goers   Re: [Portal] Coplet instance pool Thu, 01 Dec, 14:53
Carsten Ziegeler   Re: [Portal] Coplet instance pool Sat, 03 Dec, 03:56
Jean-Christophe Kermagoret [Portal] Why copletdata aren't user/role profiled ? Thu, 01 Dec, 13:22
Ralph Goers   Re: [Portal] Why copletdata aren't user/role profiled ? Thu, 01 Dec, 14:52
Jean-Christophe Kermagoret     Re: [Portal] Why copletdata aren't user/role profiled ? Thu, 01 Dec, 21:37
Ralph Goers       Re: [Portal] Why copletdata aren't user/role profiled ? Thu, 01 Dec, 22:01
Carsten Ziegeler         Re: [Portal] Why copletdata aren't user/role profiled ? Sat, 03 Dec, 03:52
Re: [Docs] Articles on Cocoon - reminder
Bertrand Delacretaz   Re: [Docs] Articles on Cocoon - reminder Thu, 01 Dec, 13:40
Reinhard Poetz     Re: [Docs] Articles on Cocoon - reminder Thu, 01 Dec, 13:56
hepabolu       Re: [Docs] Articles on Cocoon - reminder Thu, 01 Dec, 14:11
Ross Gardler         Re: [Docs] Articles on Cocoon - reminder Thu, 01 Dec, 14:36
hepabolu           Re: [Docs] Articles on Cocoon - reminder Thu, 01 Dec, 14:46
hepabolu Request for info on contribution of articles to XML.COM Thu, 01 Dec, 14:08
Kendall Clark   Re: Request for info on contribution of articles to XML.COM Thu, 01 Dec, 15:06
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35526] - File generator resolves to root context with empty src attribute
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35526] - File generator resolves to root context with empty src attribute Thu, 01 Dec, 21:19
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35526] - File generator resolves to root context with empty src attribute Thu, 01 Dec, 21:25
Alfred Nathaniel (JIRA) [jira] Commented: (COCOON-1691) ESQL compilation error Thu, 01 Dec, 21:41
Alfred Nathaniel (JIRA) [jira] Closed: (COCOON-1691) ESQL compilation error Thu, 01 Dec, 21:43
Jira: better use of the Priority field
David Crossley   Jira: better use of the Priority field Thu, 01 Dec, 23:25
David Crossley     Re: Jira: better use of the Priority field Thu, 22 Dec, 08:10
Bertrand Delacretaz       Re: Jira: better use of the Priority field Thu, 22 Dec, 08:46
Reinhard Poetz       Re: Jira: better use of the Priority field Thu, 22 Dec, 08:46
David Crossley         Re: Jira: better use of the Priority field Thu, 22 Dec, 09:20
Pier Fumagalli           Re: Jira: better use of the Priority field Thu, 22 Dec, 13:56
David Crossley             Re: Jira: better use of the Priority field Thu, 22 Dec, 22:49
Pier Fumagalli               Re: Jira: better use of the Priority field Thu, 22 Dec, 23:43
David Crossley               Re: Jira: better use of the Priority field Fri, 23 Dec, 04:07
David Crossley                 Re: Jira: better use of the Priority field Fri, 23 Dec, 04:45
David Crossley dealing with log messages from ehcache Fri, 02 Dec, 05:16
David Crossley   Re: dealing with log messages from ehcache Tue, 06 Dec, 03:13
Carsten Ziegeler     Re: dealing with log messages from ehcache Tue, 06 Dec, 16:40
David Crossley       Re: dealing with log messages from ehcache Wed, 07 Dec, 05:08
Torsten Curdt         Re: dealing with log messages from ehcache Wed, 07 Dec, 08:08
David Crossley           Re: dealing with log messages from ehcache Thu, 08 Dec, 08:21
Max Pfingsthorn "Standalone" components? Fri, 02 Dec, 11:43
Torsten Curdt   Re: "Standalone" components? Fri, 02 Dec, 11:58
Max Pfingsthorn   RE: "Standalone" components? Fri, 02 Dec, 11:59
Berin Loritsch   Re: "Standalone" components? Fri, 02 Dec, 14:41
Sylvain Wallez [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Fri, 02 Dec, 17:59
Michael Wechner   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Fri, 02 Dec, 21:33
Irv Salisbury   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Fri, 02 Dec, 21:58
Ralph Goers     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 01:19
Thomas Lutz     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 11:27
Sylvain Wallez     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 17:23
Ralph Goers   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 01:15
Carsten Ziegeler   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 04:54
Sylvain Wallez     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 17:55
Carsten Ziegeler       Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 17:03
Carsten Ziegeler         Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 17:14
Joerg Heinicke     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 20:11
Berin Loritsch   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 04:58
Sylvain Wallez     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 18:08
Berin Loritsch       Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 03:27
Joerg Heinicke     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 19:49
Berin Loritsch       Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 20:17
Ralph Goers   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 05:14
Carsten Ziegeler     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 06:08
Sylvain Wallez     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 10:09
Ralph Goers       Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 18:59
Bertrand Delacretaz   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 11:23
Luca Morandini     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 13:04
Bertrand Delacretaz       Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 14:40
Luca Morandini         Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 15:22
Sylvain Wallez     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 10:27
Bertrand Delacretaz       Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Mon, 05 Dec, 10:27
Marc Portier         Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Mon, 05 Dec, 17:25
Bertrand Delacretaz           Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Mon, 05 Dec, 17:39
Sylvain Wallez             Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Mon, 05 Dec, 18:09
Daniel Fagerstrom           Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Mon, 05 Dec, 18:34
Marc Portier             Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Tue, 06 Dec, 07:41
Luca Morandini   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 13:04
Sylvain Wallez     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 10:35
Luca Morandini       Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 16:51
Stefano Mazzocchi         Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Mon, 05 Dec, 00:52
Luca Morandini           Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Mon, 05 Dec, 10:18
Torsten Curdt             Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Mon, 05 Dec, 10:53
Stefano Mazzocchi             Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Tue, 06 Dec, 13:07
Thomas Lutz   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 13:31
Gianugo Rabellino   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 16:11
Sylvain Wallez     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 10:48
Sylvain Wallez       Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 11:07
Guido Casper     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 12:33
Joerg Heinicke     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Mon, 05 Dec, 22:36
Andrew Savory   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 17:00
Stefano Mazzocchi   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 18:00
Sylvain Wallez     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sat, 03 Dec, 18:55
hepabolu   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 08:58
Jorg Heymans   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 13:04
Reinhard Poetz     Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Sun, 04 Dec, 13:48
Daniel Fagerstrom   [RT] The next shiny thing? Sun, 04 Dec, 14:15
Reinhard Poetz     Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Sun, 04 Dec, 14:39
Sylvain Wallez     Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Sun, 04 Dec, 16:00
Carsten Ziegeler       Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Sun, 04 Dec, 15:57
Daniel Fagerstrom       Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Sun, 04 Dec, 17:47
Ralph Goers       Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Sun, 04 Dec, 19:06
Peter Hunsberger         Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Mon, 05 Dec, 15:23
Sylvain Wallez           Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Mon, 05 Dec, 16:15
Bruno Dumon             Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Mon, 05 Dec, 17:23
David Crossley             Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 00:24
Marc Portier               Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 07:10
Sylvain Wallez                 Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 08:59
Steven Noels                   Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 10:18
Sylvain Wallez                     Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 11:04
Steven Noels                       Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 12:18
Sylvain Wallez                         Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 13:33
Joerg Heinicke                         Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Thu, 08 Dec, 07:22
Ugo Cei               Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 08:12
Sylvain Wallez                 Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 09:01
Ugo Cei                   Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 09:12
Bertrand Delacretaz                     Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 09:16
hepabolu                       Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 13:37
Sylvain Wallez                     Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 09:24
Daniel Fagerstrom                 Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 09:25
Berin Loritsch                   Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 13:44
Daniel Fagerstrom                     Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 16:10
Berin Loritsch                       Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 16:35
Ralph Goers           Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 07:47
Joerg Heinicke       Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Wed, 07 Dec, 22:24
Gianugo Rabellino     Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Sun, 04 Dec, 18:53
Daniel Fagerstrom       Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Sun, 04 Dec, 20:42
Gianugo Rabellino         Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Sun, 04 Dec, 22:24
David Crossley           Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Mon, 05 Dec, 00:46
Gianugo Rabellino             Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Mon, 05 Dec, 09:12
Upayavira               2.2 vs 3.0, or 2.2 then 3.0? Mon, 05 Dec, 10:00
Sylvain Wallez                 Re: 2.2 vs 3.0, or 2.2 then 3.0? Mon, 05 Dec, 11:32
Berin Loritsch                 Re: 2.2 vs 3.0, or 2.2 then 3.0? Mon, 05 Dec, 14:04
Upayavira                   Re: 2.2 vs 3.0, or 2.2 then 3.0? Mon, 05 Dec, 14:11
Sylvain Wallez                     Re: 2.2 vs 3.0, or 2.2 then 3.0? Mon, 05 Dec, 14:24
hepabolu                   Re: 2.2 vs 3.0, or 2.2 then 3.0? Mon, 05 Dec, 14:23
Berin Loritsch                     Re: 2.2 vs 3.0, or 2.2 then 3.0? Mon, 05 Dec, 14:39
Upayavira                     Re: 2.2 vs 3.0, or 2.2 then 3.0? Mon, 05 Dec, 15:04
David Crossley               Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 02:45
Jorg Heymans           Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Mon, 05 Dec, 07:53
Sylvain Wallez         Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Sun, 04 Dec, 22:49
Ugo Cei   Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation Mon, 05 Dec, 08:34
Tim Williams (JIRA) [jira] Commented: (COCOON-1542) File generator resolves to root context with empty src attribute Fri, 02 Dec, 19:15
Sylvain Wallez [ignore] test Fri, 02 Dec, 20:05
Upayavira   Re: [ignore] test Fri, 02 Dec, 21:03
Vadim Gritsenko   Re: [ignore] test Fri, 02 Dec, 21:15
Mark Lundquist     Re: [ignore] test Sat, 03 Dec, 00:23
Antonio Gallardo     Re: [ignore] test Sat, 03 Dec, 00:39
Jorg Heymans       Re: [ignore] test Sat, 03 Dec, 10:13
Sylvain Wallez       Re: [ignore] test Sat, 03 Dec, 11:27
Antonio Gallardo         Re: [ignore] test Sat, 03 Dec, 22:14
Re: [Concrete Thought] How to modify web.xml from a block properly?
Torsten Schlabach   Re: [Concrete Thought] How to modify web.xml from a block properly? Fri, 02 Dec, 22:45
[RRT] Cocoon 3? Defined by what it doesn't have
Berin Loritsch   [RRT] Cocoon 3? Defined by what it doesn't have Sat, 03 Dec, 15:50
Berin Loritsch   [RRT] Cocoon 3? Defined by what it doesn't have Sat, 03 Dec, 16:18
Reinhard Poetz Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Sun, 04 Dec, 14:36
Jorg Heymans   Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Sun, 04 Dec, 17:12
Daniel Fagerstrom     Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Sun, 04 Dec, 20:52
Reinhard Poetz       Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 06:47
Jorg Heymans         Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 08:41
Reinhard Poetz           Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 14:05
Reinhard Poetz           Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 06 Dec, 19:43
Daniel Fagerstrom             Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 06 Dec, 20:34
Reinhard Poetz               Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 06 Dec, 21:00
Jorg Heymans               Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 06 Dec, 22:12
Daniel Fagerstrom                 Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 06 Dec, 22:32
Upayavira                   Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 06 Dec, 22:34
Carsten Ziegeler                     Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 06 Dec, 16:42
Marc Portier             Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Wed, 07 Dec, 13:46
Reinhard Poetz               Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Wed, 07 Dec, 16:46
BURGHARD Éric       Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 12:01
g[R]eK         Cocoon 2.1.x - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 12:27
Bertrand Delacretaz           Re: Cocoon 2.1.x - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 13:15
BURGHARD Éric             Re: Cocoon 2.1.x - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 14:41
Bertrand Delacretaz               Re: Cocoon 2.1.x - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 13:55
BURGHARD Éric                 Re: Cocoon 2.1.x - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 17:39
Bertrand Delacretaz                   Re: Cocoon 2.1.x - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 17:11
g[R]eK                     Re: Cocoon 2.1.x - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 19:13
BURGHARD Éric                       Re: Cocoon 2.1.x - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 06 Dec, 02:05
Jorg Heymans             Re: Cocoon 2.1.x - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 17:13
Bertrand Delacretaz               Re: Cocoon 2.1.x - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 17:31
g[R]eK           Re: Cocoon 2.1.x - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 19:11
Daniel Fagerstrom         Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 06 Dec, 21:12
Reinhard Poetz     Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 05 Dec, 06:47
Reinhard Poetz   Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 12 Dec, 14:38
Daniel Fagerstrom     Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 12 Dec, 20:28
Reinhard Poetz       Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 13 Dec, 08:03
Reinhard Poetz     Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 13 Dec, 08:09
Jorg Heymans       Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 13 Dec, 10:17
Andreas Hochsteger         Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Thu, 15 Dec, 18:42
Jorg Heymans           Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Thu, 15 Dec, 22:23
Jörg Schaible             Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Fri, 16 Dec, 19:10
Jorg Heymans               Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Sat, 17 Dec, 09:16
Reinhard Poetz           Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Fri, 16 Dec, 07:17
Andreas Hochsteger             Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Sat, 17 Dec, 09:41
Reinhard Poetz               Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Sat, 17 Dec, 10:01
Andreas Hochsteger                 Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Sat, 17 Dec, 16:33
Reinhard Poetz                   Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Sun, 18 Dec, 12:51
Andreas Hochsteger                     Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Mon, 19 Dec, 05:59
Daniel Fagerstrom       Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Tue, 13 Dec, 19:56
Antonio Gallardo         Re: Cocoon 2.2 - Build and deployment with Maven2 Wed, 14 Dec, 00:22
Very basic problem with custom Avalon component
Stefan Pietschmann   Very basic problem with custom Avalon component Sun, 04 Dec, 19:38
Stefan Pietschmann   Very basic problem with custom Avalon component Mon, 05 Dec, 07:53
Sylvain Wallez     Re: Very basic problem with custom Avalon component Mon, 05 Dec, 08:10
bugzi...@apache.org Bug report for Cocoon 2 [2005/12/04] Sun, 04 Dec, 22:08
Re: Resource comparison between Cocoon and Struts/JSP??
David Crossley   Re: Resource comparison between Cocoon and Struts/JSP?? Sun, 04 Dec, 23:25
Irv Salisbury     Re: Resource comparison between Cocoon and Struts/JSP?? Mon, 05 Dec, 04:06
Matthew Langham   RE: Resource comparison between Cocoon and Struts/JSP?? Mon, 05 Dec, 07:07
AW: Very basic problem with custom Avalon component
Stefan Pietschmann   AW: Very basic problem with custom Avalon component Mon, 05 Dec, 08:21
Stefan Pietschmann   AW: Very basic problem with custom Avalon component Mon, 05 Dec, 08:27
Sylvain Wallez     Re: AW: Very basic problem with custom Avalon component Mon, 05 Dec, 08:44
Stefan Pietschmann [Solved] Very basic problem with custom Avalon component Mon, 05 Dec, 08:52
Krystian Nowak (JIRA) [jira] Utworzone: (COCOON-1701) A patch for caching fonts (fixes GDI issues), vertical text orientation, color code fix, prefered unit for margins and measure unit converter Mon, 05 Dec, 09:27
Krystian Nowak (JIRA) [jira] Utworzone: (COCOON-1702) A patch for caching fonts (fixes GDI issues), vertical text orientation, color code fix, prefered unit for margins and measure unit converter Mon, 05 Dec, 09:36
Krystian Nowak (JIRA) [jira] Zamknięte: (COCOON-1702) A patch for caching fonts (fixes GDI issues), vertical text orientation, color code fix, prefered unit for margins and measure unit converter Mon, 05 Dec, 09:36
Krystian Nowak (JIRA) [jira] Zamknięte: (COCOON-1701) A patch for caching fonts (fixes GDI issues), vertical text orientation, color code fix, prefered unit for margins and measure unit converter Mon, 05 Dec, 09:36
Krystian Nowak (JIRA) [jira] Utworzone: (COCOON-1703) A patch for caching fonts (fixes GDI issues), vertical text orientation, color code fix, prefered unit for margins and measure unit converter Mon, 05 Dec, 09:38
Matthew Langham RE: 2.2 vs 3.0, or 2.2 then 3.0? Mon, 05 Dec, 11:10
Berin Loritsch Recent Short Story Why We Need Something New Mon, 05 Dec, 14:33
Pier Fumagalli (JIRA) [jira] Created: (COCOON-1704) Error Message brokenness when SAXON is used as the XSLT transformer. Mon, 05 Dec, 14:49
Krystian Nowak (JIRA) [jira] Zaktualizowane: (COCOON-1703) A patch for caching fonts (fixes GDI issues), vertical text orientation, color code fix, prefered unit for margins and measure unit converter Mon, 05 Dec, 15:28
Giacomo Pati JMX integration (was: Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation) Mon, 05 Dec, 16:08
Gianugo Rabellino   Re: JMX integration (was: Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation) Mon, 05 Dec, 17:04
Giacomo Pati     Re: JMX integration (was: Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation) Mon, 05 Dec, 21:36
Gianugo Rabellino       Re: JMX integration (was: Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation) Mon, 05 Dec, 22:24
Giacomo Pati         Re: JMX integration (was: Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation) Tue, 06 Dec, 06:16
Giacomo Pati     Re: JMX integration (was: Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation) Thu, 15 Dec, 21:36
Carsten Ziegeler       Re: JMX integration Thu, 22 Dec, 00:01
Upayavira         Re: JMX integration Thu, 22 Dec, 00:00
Giacomo Pati           Re: JMX integration Thu, 22 Dec, 17:17
Giacomo Pati             Re: JMX integration Fri, 23 Dec, 07:43
Carsten Ziegeler             Re: JMX integration Fri, 23 Dec, 08:19
Reinhard Poetz               Re: JMX integration Fri, 23 Dec, 08:50
Giacomo Pati                 Re: JMX integration Fri, 23 Dec, 10:46
Reinhard Poetz                   Re: JMX integration Fri, 23 Dec, 11:02
Giacomo Pati               Re: JMX integration Fri, 23 Dec, 10:44
Sylvain Wallez                 Re: JMX integration Fri, 23 Dec, 11:07
Giacomo Pati         Re: JMX integration Thu, 22 Dec, 17:11
Carsten Ziegeler           Re: JMX integration Fri, 23 Dec, 08:16
Giacomo Pati             Re: JMX integration Fri, 23 Dec, 10:32
Berin Loritsch Listening to Users? Or Doing what we think is best? Mon, 05 Dec, 16:17
Tim Larson where is the box? Tue, 06 Dec, 05:52
Irv Salisbury   Re: where is the box? Tue, 06 Dec, 13:57
Ben Anderson     Re: where is the box? Sat, 10 Dec, 14:08
Re: [RT] The next shiny thing?
Reinhard Poetz   Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 07:53
Matthew Langham   RE: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 09:17
Sylvain Wallez     Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 09:23
Bertrand Delacretaz     Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 09:24
Romano Trampus   RE: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 15:05
Daniel Fagerstrom     Re: [RT] The next shiny thing? Tue, 06 Dec, 15:14
Robin Wyles RepeaterJXPathBinding Tue, 06 Dec, 11:02
Robin Wyles AJAX and upload field Tue, 06 Dec, 11:10
Sylvain Wallez   Re: AJAX and upload field Tue, 06 Dec, 11:20
Robin Wyles     Re: AJAX and upload field Tue, 06 Dec, 11:51
Robin Wyles       Re: AJAX and upload field Tue, 06 Dec, 11:53
BURGHARD Éric Problem with loc namespace Tue, 06 Dec, 14:25
Berin Loritsch [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Tue, 06 Dec, 17:29
Sylvain Wallez   Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 07:36
Ross Gardler     Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 08:10
Bertrand Delacretaz       Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 08:16
Ross Gardler         Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 10:43
Mats Norén           Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 11:02
Ross Gardler             Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 20:20
Sylvain Wallez               Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Thu, 08 Dec, 09:10
Ross Gardler                 Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Thu, 08 Dec, 12:18
Ross Gardler                   Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Thu, 08 Dec, 12:23
Ugo Cei           Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 17:06
Ross Gardler             OT [Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done] Wed, 07 Dec, 20:31
Torsten Curdt       Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 08:40
Ugo Cei         Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 08:57
Sylvain Wallez           Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 09:13
Ugo Cei             Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 13:57
Berin Loritsch         [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 14:23
Berin Loritsch           Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 14:25
Ralph Goers             Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 14:39
Berin Loritsch               Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 14:48
Ralph Goers                 Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 15:42
Ross Gardler                 Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 15:47
Berin Loritsch                   Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 15:56
hepabolu           Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 14:36
Berin Loritsch             Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 14:44
Vadim Gritsenko           Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 15:11
Sylvain Wallez           Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 15:56
Niclas Hedhman             Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Sat, 10 Dec, 06:24
Ugo Cei           Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 17:09
Berin Loritsch             Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 17:21
Ross Gardler             Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 20:33
Mark Lundquist           Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 17:24
Daniel Fagerstrom           Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 18:10
Niclas Hedhman             Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Sat, 10 Dec, 06:36
Bertrand Delacretaz           Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 19:58
Aurélien DEHAY           Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 21:17
Berin Loritsch             Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 21:32
Thomas Lutz           Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Wed, 07 Dec, 23:26
Berin Loritsch             Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Thu, 08 Dec, 04:53
Andreas Hochsteger               Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Thu, 08 Dec, 09:18
Andrew Savory             Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) Mon, 12 Dec, 11:47
Vadim Gritsenko         Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Wed, 07 Dec, 15:41
dave-   Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done Fri, 09 Dec, 06:12
Upayavira An entirely new beast Tue, 06 Dec, 22:31
Mark Lundquist   Re: An entirely new beast Tue, 06 Dec, 22:42
Berin Loritsch   Re: An entirely new beast Tue, 06 Dec, 23:06
Reinhard Poetz   Re: An entirely new beast Wed, 07 Dec, 05:56
Sylvain Wallez   Re: An entirely new beast Wed, 07 Dec, 10:00
Vadim Gritsenko     Re: An entirely new beast Wed, 07 Dec, 14:28
Sylvain Wallez       Re: An entirely new beast Wed, 07 Dec, 15:59
Ugo Cei       Re: An entirely new beast Wed, 07 Dec, 17:13
Berin Loritsch         Re: An entirely new beast Wed, 07 Dec, 17:22
Antonio Gallardo         Re: An entirely new beast Wed, 07 Dec, 17:47
Ralph Goers         Re: An entirely new beast Wed, 07 Dec, 19:15
Antonio Gallardo           Re: An entirely new beast Wed, 07 Dec, 21:19
Daniel Fagerstrom   Re: An entirely new beast Wed, 07 Dec, 12:36
lordsh help please! Tue, 06 Dec, 23:52
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Mar 201415
Feb 201433
Nov 201312
Oct 20139
Aug 20135
Jul 201365
Jun 201318
May 20137
Apr 20135
Mar 201346
Feb 2013112
Jan 201378
Dec 201291
Nov 2012106
Oct 201226
Sep 201264
Aug 201228
Jul 201248
Jun 2012121
May 2012104
Apr 201277
Mar 2012122
Feb 201229
Jan 201286
Dec 2011105
Nov 201154
Oct 201148
Sep 201153
Aug 201188
Jul 201179
Jun 201188
May 20119
Apr 201136
Mar 201114
Feb 201144
Jan 201134
Dec 201027
Nov 201015
Oct 201016
Sep 201016
Aug 201025
Jul 201033
Jun 201022
May 201012
Apr 2010149
Mar 201097
Feb 201037
Jan 201065
Dec 2009120
Nov 200980
Oct 200950
Sep 200947
Aug 200976
Jul 200985
Jun 200943
May 200956
Apr 200985
Mar 200968
Feb 2009188
Jan 2009221
Dec 2008137
Nov 2008128
Oct 2008106
Sep 2008145
Aug 2008398
Jul 2008427
Jun 2008156
May 2008136
Apr 2008265
Mar 2008572
Feb 2008123
Jan 2008340
Dec 2007400
Nov 2007272
Oct 2007341
Sep 2007424
Aug 2007674
Jul 2007513
Jun 2007381
May 2007552
Apr 2007467
Mar 2007688
Feb 2007662
Jan 2007770
Dec 2006802
Nov 2006611
Oct 2006669
Sep 2006414
Aug 2006689
Jul 2006494
Jun 2006430
May 2006945
Apr 2006482
Mar 2006865
Feb 2006773
Jan 20061102
Dec 2005765
Nov 20051029
Oct 20052338
Sep 20051300
Aug 2005951
Jul 2005567
Jun 2005970
May 20051219
Apr 2005851
Mar 2005999
Feb 2005868
Jan 20051090
Dec 20041022
Nov 20041448
Oct 20041499
Sep 2004644
Aug 2004689
Jul 20041058
Jun 20041190
May 20041317
Apr 20041709
Mar 20042207
Feb 20041557
Jan 20041277
Dec 20031289
Nov 20031772
Oct 20032017
Sep 20031316
Aug 20031394
Jul 20031491
Jun 20031215
May 20031864
Apr 20031634
Mar 20031979
Feb 20031519
Jan 20031400
Dec 20021092
Nov 2002975
Oct 20021019
Sep 2002662
Aug 2002904
Jul 20021003
Jun 20021402
May 20021115
Apr 20021307
Mar 20021557
Feb 20021431
Jan 20021533
Dec 20011134
Nov 20011069
Oct 2001921
Sep 2001700
Aug 2001779
Jul 20011160
Jun 2001874
May 2001952
Apr 2001812
Mar 2001558
Feb 2001744
Jan 2001681
Dec 2000576
Nov 2000633
Oct 2000880
Sep 2000808
Aug 2000528
Jul 2000689
Jun 2000882
May 2000913
Apr 2000858
Mar 2000736
Feb 2000764
Jan 20001086