Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-82712-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 46505 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2005 17:53:24 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Dec 2005 17:53:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 65156 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2005 08:47:20 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65115 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2005 08:47:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65104 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2005 08:47:19 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 00:47:19 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ap-cocoon-dev@m.gmane.org
 designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender)
Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 00:47:19 -0800
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Em5mo-0000RB-Ty
	for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:45:27 +0100
Received: from srvgw12.rauser-ag.com ([217.146.133.165])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:45:26 +0100
Received: from joerg.heinicke by srvgw12.rauser-ag.com with local (Gmexim 0.1
 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:45:26 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
From: Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Roadmap for 2.2 [was Re: [RT] Ditching the environment
 abstraction]
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:44:40 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <loom.20051213T094110-722@post.gmane.org>
References: <439DF661.5010608@apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 217.146.133.165 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-DE;
 rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050919 Firefox/1.0.7)
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler <at> apache.org> writes:

> >>And for me the most important question :) What is the suggested
> >>timeframe/version for this? Do you want to do this for 2.2?
> >
> > So it sounds like 2.2.
> 
> Hmm, ok, this is a point where I disagree :) I think we should get 2.2
> out asap to have our mind clear for new stuff.

+1

> So as soon as the m2
> integration works, we can polish 2.2 a little bit and then release the
> core and each blocks as 2.2 and from the on develop the core and the
> blocks independently and release them independently. Everything else can
> follow later on.

+1

Let's get 2.2 "as is" and start with "ditching the environment" immediately
after the first 2.2 release, so it will go in a 2.3 or however it will be named.

Jörg