Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51552 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2005 17:22:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Dec 2005 17:22:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 29604 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2005 17:21:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 29514 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2005 17:21:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 29503 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2005 17:21:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 09:21:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of bloritsch@d-haven.org designates 65.212.180.79 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.212.180.79] (HELO pyramid-04.kattare.com) (65.212.180.79) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 09:21:52 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([66.208.37.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by pyramid-04.kattare.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jB7HLR9a024501 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:21:31 -0800 Message-ID: <43971A24.1030408@d-haven.org> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:21:40 -0500 From: Berin Loritsch User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [Poll] We need to align on one point (was Re: [Vision] Knowing When We are Done) References: <4395CA8F.6020405@d-haven.org> <439690E2.4000506@apache.org> <439698EC.8060803@apache.org> <1BD38A83-0648-4205-991F-F0A5FAD87223@apache.org> <4396F05D.9030106@d-haven.org> <9D94D01B-5DCD-4529-A5AB-D937266336D2@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <9D94D01B-5DCD-4529-A5AB-D937266336D2@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N So far it seems as if we are looking at two options: Pure Java or status quo. And so far we are something along the lines of 2 for Java and 2 (possibly 3) for status quo. Anyone else have input? Ugo Cei wrote: > > Il giorno 07/dic/05, alle ore 15:23, Berin Loritsch ha scritto: > >> What's your preference for the vision? >> >> [ ] All web apps written in JavaScript >> [X ] All web apps written in pure Java >> [ ] Mix and match (not as simple, but is status quo with today) >> > > Ugo > >