Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4396D766.3080202@nada.kth.se>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:36:54 +0100
From: Daniel Fagerstrom <danielf@nada.kth.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: An entirely new beast
References: <43961144.90709@odoko.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <43961144.90709@odoko.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Upayavira wrote:
...

>So, what I'd propose is we choose another name, and consider it to be a
>new subproject of Cocoon. A "new, exciting web development framework
>from the people that brought you Apache Cocoon".
>  
>
Right, let us stay above the boring tech talk and focus on finding a new 
name that symbolizes in an accurate and yet engaging way our common, 
deeply felt need for moving beyond the current frustration, towards a 
new, different, bright and sexy future.

>And, the existing Cocoon carries on as long as people want and need it.
>Maybe 3.0 could still be the OSGi version. It may well still bring huge
>benefits to those using the current generation of Cocoon.
>  
>
Great, why choose between focusing on 2.1.x, 2.2, our previous idea 
about 3.0 and the new vision. Lets just have it all.
...

>(P.S. If people do agree, I'd say please refrain from providing possible
>names at the moment. We can discuss that later. For now, let's see if
>people agree with what I am suggesting).
>  
>
I agree, still I can't refrain from suggesting Cocoon Raba Hiff, 
http://asplund.arch.kth.se/~a96_osa/bonk/ptoday.html, as a hommage to a 
great predecesor.

Let us together strive for maximizing the dev-list/cvs-list volume ratio.

/Daniel

[I'm deeply sorry, the voices in my head took control over my writing 
for a short while]