Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4093 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2005 11:09:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2005 11:09:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 95234 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2005 11:09:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 94619 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2005 11:09:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 94591 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2005 11:09:38 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 03:09:38 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.27.42.27] (HELO smtp1-g19.free.fr) (212.27.42.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 03:08:00 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.100] (unknown [81.56.134.235]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A11167F24 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 12:07:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4392CDFA.7060702@apache.org> Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:07:38 +0100 From: Sylvain Wallez User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation References: <43908B84.7070909@apache.org> <7557e99f0512030811r3e697723uf741b6504418e747@mail.gmail.com> <4392C985.7040402@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4392C985.7040402@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Actually, with the pipeline API, the ability to expand aggregations > inline and virtual pipeline components, I'm wondering if we still need > the "cocoon:" protocol at all. Wrote too fast: yes, we still need "cocoon:", otherwise XInclude becomes rather useless, and serving an aggregated page while still giving direct access to its part really won't be practical. Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://bluxte.net http://www.anyware-tech.com Apache Software Foundation Member Research & Technology Director