cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Giacomo Pati <giac...@apache.org>
Subject Re: JMX integration
Date Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:32:10 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:16:51 +0100
> From: Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>
> Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: JMX integration
> 
> Giacomo Pati wrote:
>> Comparing jetty's jmx helper calsses to the commons-modeler I see
>> benefits for jetty's as that package supports MBean arrays whereas
>> commons-modeler only supports primitive arrays. MBean array would make
>> it possible to make array components implementing the same interface
>> (ServiceSelector) directly registrable as MBean (for those which
>> implements an MBean interface).
>>
> Ah, ok, so it seems jetty's support is the better choice then.

Yes, my impression.

>
>>
>>>> So, big +1 for adding JMX support to 2.2 :)
>>
>>
>> And what about 2.1?
>>
> No, not for 2.1 - 2.1.x is just a maintenance branch - at least we keep
> saying this...and we all tell everyone that 2.2 will be out soon, so
> from that perspective there is no real need for adding this to 2.1.

Ok, I'll keep my fingers from 2.1 :-)

- -- 
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDq9IwLNdJvZjjVZARAq70AKCH8WixxU30b2noLhLrwfh0w4m38ACg5nN7
OwxCdgeD56S3Qmu52EeDm7U=
=peM3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message