cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthew Langham" <mlang...@s-und-n.de>
Subject RE: 2.2 vs 3.0, or 2.2 then 3.0?
Date Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:10:05 GMT
Upayavira nails it IMO.

> 
> So, 2.2 = important, and 3.0 = important. Both.
> 
> We need to avoid discussions, implications, emotions, etc 
> that suggest otherwise.
> 
> We need to give the message to our existing users that their 
> code will be supported for a long time, that it is still safe 
> to continue using 2.1/2.2. After all, we will all ourselves 
> have code using it for a long time, much like some of us 
> probably have code running that still uses Cocoon 1.X.
> 

+1

Remember: Without Users there will be no need for either a version 3 or 2.2!

Matthew


Mime
View raw message