cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reinhard Poetz <>
Subject Re: JMX integration
Date Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:50:28 GMT
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Giacomo Pati wrote:
>>>>>So, big +1 for adding JMX support to 2.2 :)
>>>>So long as the new dependency isn't one for the core, but can be
>>>>contained in a block.
>>No, this is why I'm seeking for suggestions. JMX support has to be 
>>implemented in the core (CoreComponentManager IIRC) and thus will 
>>introduce new dependencies.
> I can't imagine a real good solution that is *not* in the core and I
> think adding JMX support to the core makes more sense as this enables
> JMX for everything, even for block management or whatever.
>>>From your description I got the impression that this is an optional
> dependency, so we need it just for compilation, right? I see absolutely
> no problem with this. If we block new great things just because they add
> a new dependency we will never get any further.

excactly, and as Daniel said once, we are great at blocking things even before 
somebody started to write a single line of code.

Big +1 from my side for JMX support!

Reinhard Pötz           Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach 

{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}


View raw message