cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carsten Ziegeler <>
Subject Re: JMX integration
Date Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:19:39 GMT
Giacomo Pati wrote:
>>>>So, big +1 for adding JMX support to 2.2 :)
>>>So long as the new dependency isn't one for the core, but can be
>>>contained in a block.
> No, this is why I'm seeking for suggestions. JMX support has to be 
> implemented in the core (CoreComponentManager IIRC) and thus will 
> introduce new dependencies.
I can't imagine a real good solution that is *not* in the core and I
think adding JMX support to the core makes more sense as this enables
JMX for everything, even for block management or whatever.
>From your description I got the impression that this is an optional
dependency, so we need it just for compilation, right? I see absolutely
no problem with this. If we block new great things just because they add
a new dependency we will never get any further.

Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG

View raw message