Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>
> The servlet set of apis is allready an abstraction, we have due to
> historical circumstances another abstraction of the same concepts. To
> me the abstractions look fairly similar, except for the Cocoon
> aditions that have been mentioned. What am I missing more specifically?
What exactly are the sevlet apis an abstraction of?
> We could have compablity wrapper. Question is do we want to simplify
> or not?
What, exactly are we simplifying? There is no way that we won't always
have a "real" HttpServletRequest. AFAICS there is no way that we can
just use it. So what would replace the existing Request object? In
order to understand this I really need to know exactly what the new
object would be.
Ralph
|