Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42970 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2005 13:01:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Nov 2005 13:01:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 97503 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2005 13:01:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 97424 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2005 13:01:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 97409 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2005 13:01:25 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 05:01:25 -0800 Message-ID: <4381C54B.3010808@apache.org> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:02:03 +0100 From: Carsten Ziegeler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Planning 2.2 References: <4380C369.4090606@apache.org> <4381996A.80408@nada.kth.se> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jorg Heymans wrote: > > +1, separate release cycles for more and quicker releases. > > We could start this process incrementally today by just deploying > snapshots of the 2.2 core jar. No huge announcements or anything, just > get it out there for the bleeding-edgers and to test the release > process. Once we feel comfortable we can do the same for a few blocks. > To avoid the deployment issue, we can opt to just distribute the jars > and assume the bleeding-edgers being clever enough to add the block > configuration themselves from the docs. > > In parallel we can maintain a core 2.2 archetype that sets up a working > webapp structure for the 2.2 core (and perhaps some samples to > demonstrate). This should satisfy the "curious-but-not-bleeding-edge" > people in their eagerness to explore the new and noteworthy in 2.2 core. > > > How does that sound? > +1 Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/