cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Fagerstrom <>
Subject Re: Planning 2.2
Date Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:48:09 GMT
Jorg Heymans wrote:

>Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>The question is if we are going to start to have separate release cycles
>>of the blocks with 2.2. In that case the important part is a cocoon-core
>>2.2 release. Then we should preferably have releases of CForms,
>>Template, Portal and some other important blocks that are compatible
>>with the cocoon-core 2.2. But all blocks need not to have stable
>>releases some of them can be milestone releases or even "alpha".
>>IMO we should go for separate release cycles for 2.2. Then the we should
>>release "2.2" when the core is stable enough, and consider whether the
>>blocks are stable enough, a separate concern.
>+1, separate release cycles for more and quicker releases.
>We could start this process incrementally today by just deploying
>snapshots of the 2.2 core jar. No huge announcements or anything, just
>get it out there for the bleeding-edgers and to test the release
>process. Once we feel comfortable we can do the same for a few blocks.
>To avoid the deployment issue, we can opt to just distribute the jars
>and assume the bleeding-edgers being clever enough to add the block
>configuration themselves from the docs.
>In parallel we can maintain a core 2.2 archetype that sets up a working
>webapp structure for the 2.2 core (and perhaps some samples to
>demonstrate). This should satisfy the "curious-but-not-bleeding-edge"
>people in their eagerness to explore the new and noteworthy in 2.2 core.
>How does that sound?
It sounds great!


View raw message