cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Upayavira ...@odoko.co.uk>
Subject Re: cocoon 2.1.8rc1
Date Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:06:01 GMT
Torsten Curdt wrote:
> 
> On 08.11.2005, at 23:53, David Crossley wrote:
> 
>> Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>
>>>>>> It is a shame, but these samples never got over the loss on the 
xml
>>>>>> docs that used to be distributed with Cocoon.
>>>>>> These were what were indexed for those samples AFAIR.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Remove them?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Erk, that is bad. How about just leaving them there,
>>>> knowing that they are broken, with a notice on the Lucene
>>>> Samples page. Someone might be able to later add a
>>>> specific set of example docs.
>>>
>>>
>>> Erk, that is even worse ;-)
>>>
>>> Seriously: releasing with a broken sample
>>> does not really spread confidence in a
>>> product.
>>
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> I believe that throwing the work away, just because
>> no-one can find a bit of time to fix it, is a
>> community destroyer. Why would people bother to
>> contribute examples when the work gets thrown away
>> so easily.
> 
> 
> We have a SCM ...nothing gets thrown away.
> Just not included in the release. At least
> to me that's the better option. But anyway.
> 
> Best would be of course to just fix it ;)

Or we could leave the sample there but remove it from the menu. Can't
see it but don't remove the code.

Regards, Upayavira


Mime
View raw message