On 05.11.2005 08:46, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>> So let's make other proposals. Let's consider wiget "foo.bar" (e.g. a
>> fd:field in a fd:group) and the ID of its <input>.
>> - "foo.bar..input": the '.' is doubled, which can never conflict with
>> a widget's full name
>> - "foo.bar._input": generated element's name starts with a character
>> that we can forbid as the first character of widget names
>>
>> I prefer the first one (double '.') which is IMO more readable than
>> the second.
>
> Another one, which looks more natural: "foo.bar.input.": the trailing
> '.' ensures it cannot conflict with a widget's full name
I definitely prefer the ones which can not conflict with other widget's
full name instead of forbidding another character. Your last proposal
with trailing dot is the one I like most.
Jörg
|