cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pier Fumagalli (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (COCOON-1696) A humongous number of blocks is required to support the "webdav:" source
Date Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:24:41 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1696?page=comments#action_12358312 ] 

Pier Fumagalli commented on COCOON-1696:
----------------------------------------

I think most dependancies are real (I tried compiling without explicitly including them and
samples off, it failed).

My thing is, 4 classes to allow Cocoon to use WebDav (for example, using the TraversableGenerator).

Those 4 classes should be either in "core" or we should have a some sort of different block.

> A humongous number of blocks is required to support the "webdav:" source
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: COCOON-1696
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1696
>      Project: Cocoon
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: Blocks: WebDAV
>     Versions: 2.1.8
>     Reporter: Pier Fumagalli

>
> As far as I can see, the "webdav:" source factory (org.apache.cocoon.components.source.impl.WebDAVSourceFActory)
only relies on a handful of classes:
> - org.apache.cocoon.components.source.InspectableSource
> - org.apache.cocoon.components.source.helpers.SourceProperty
> - org.apache.cocoon.components.source.impl.WebDAVSource
> This compiles and works.
> That said, if I were to include the "webdav" block, I would have to include through dependancies
the following blocks:
> webdav
>  |
>  +-> repository
>       |
>       +-> databases
>       |    |
>       |    +-> xsp
>       |   
>       +-> eventcache
>            |
>            +-> jms
>                 |
>                 +-> cron
>                 |
>                 +-> databases
>                 |    |
>                 |    +-> xsp
>                 |
>                 +-> hsqldb
> Don't you think this is a little bit excessive for including 4 classes?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message