Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67539 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2005 20:45:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2005 20:45:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 41226 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2005 20:45:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 41150 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2005 20:45:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 41138 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2005 20:45:24 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:45:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ralph.goers@dslextreme.com designates 66.51.199.81 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.51.199.81] (HELO mail5.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.81) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:45:26 -0700 Received: (qmail 17083 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2005 20:44:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO belagio) (66.51.196.164) by mail5.dslextreme.com with SMTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:44:57 -0700 Message-ID: <434EC74D.20700@dslextreme.com> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:45:01 -0700 From: Ralph Goers Reply-To: rgoers@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.4.1 (X11/20050719) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: ApplesProcessor - a little crazy idea References: <434E7BCB.4090206@mobilebox.pl> <434E8075.2050902@apache.org> <434E831D.806@mobilebox.pl> <0BD69214-64A9-4634-AFA5-B741F9DAB8C1@apache.org> <434E8C6B.7010702@reverycodes.com> <434E8F8E.60407@dslextreme.com> <434EBBDB.90106@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <434EBBDB.90106@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Reinhard Poetz wrote: > Ralph Goers wrote: > >> I second that. We really need to find a better term than "stable". > > > One of those discussions hitting us every 3 to 6 months. Anyway, last > time we agreed (for blocks) that we split up stability into three parts: > > - api > - implementation > - community > > This is also reflected by the block.xml schema. Anything new this time? I don't recall the last discussion. Obviously, if there was an agreement nothing was done about it. Currently gump.xml only has status="value". How do the 3 parts get reflected into that? How does the fact that the api is stable but the implementation needs to be verified get presented so that we can easily see that? Ralph