Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6808 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2005 11:39:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2005 11:39:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 30928 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2005 11:39:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 30422 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2005 11:39:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 30411 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2005 11:39:50 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 04:39:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [130.237.222.115] (HELO smtp.nada.kth.se) (130.237.222.115) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 04:39:52 -0700 X-Authentication-Info: The sender was authenticated as danielf using PLAIN at smtp.nada.kth.se Received: from [192.168.105.132] ([62.84.203.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.nada.kth.se (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9CBdRZ3009106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:39:28 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <434CF642.4040004@nada.kth.se> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:40:50 +0200 From: Daniel Fagerstrom User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Roadmap for Cocoon Blocks References: <434B4E42.1040801@apache.org> <007e8841da9dd6b00b42956c9fb05ff6@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Pier Fumagalli wrote: > On 11 Oct 2005, at 20:16, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >> Le 11 oct. 05, � 07:31, Reinhard Poetz a �crit : >> >>> ...- Cocoon 2.2 will not use OSGi but will support blocks as far as >>> possible:... >> >>> ...- Cocoon 3.0 will use OSGi --> shielding classloader and hot >>> plugablillity... >> >>> ...WDOT? >> >> +1 to the plan. >> >> Just one small nitpicking comment, we should say "3.0 will *most >> probably* use OSGI" - as you said, it's a nice goal to have but I >> don't think we're 100% positive on that yet, there are still a few >> unknowns. > > I agree wholeheartedly... I am not 100% sure that OSGI is the perfect > solution. AFAICS it's a little bit too cumbersome for my brain. > > And I know a lot of others share my concerns (from discussions at the > GT). > > Pier Any specific concerns about OSGi? /Daniel