Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61901 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2005 09:17:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2005 09:17:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 67241 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2005 09:17:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 67173 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2005 09:17:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 67162 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2005 09:17:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:17:35 -0700 Message-ID: <434CD54A.70608@apache.org> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:20:10 +0200 From: Carsten Ziegeler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: The real Processor concerns References: <434BD265.1070201@d-haven.org> <434BD6F5.2010704@apache.org> <434BE58D.8070200@reverycodes.com> <434BF40B.3000808@apache.org> <4563AD9C-901B-42ED-81DB-4286E5F10AAE@betaversion.org> In-Reply-To: <4563AD9C-901B-42ED-81DB-4286E5F10AAE@betaversion.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Sorry if I sound silly, but in the XCONF we can define what > components we load in the ComponentManager, and are exposed > throughout the entire Cocoon. > > Now, given that 2.2 has a classloader-per-sitemap feature, would that > mean that the components declared in the sitemap's XCONF are going to > be loaded by the same classloader? > If you mean the sitemap classloader, then, yes, that one is used for the components defined per sitemap. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/