Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73398 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2005 23:32:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2005 23:32:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 27197 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2005 23:32:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 26663 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2005 23:32:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 26491 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2005 23:32:47 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:32:46 -0700 Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ralph.goers@dslextreme.com designates 66.51.199.81 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.51.199.81] (HELO mail5.dslextreme.com) (66.51.199.81) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:32:49 -0700 Received: (qmail 31146 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2005 23:32:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO belagio) (66.51.196.164) by mail5.dslextreme.com with SMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:32:20 -0700 Message-ID: <434C4B88.4080208@dslextreme.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:32:24 -0700 From: Ralph Goers Reply-To: rgoers@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.4.1 (X11/20050719) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r312968 - in /cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X: ./ src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/source/impl/validity/ src/java/org/apache/cocoon/i18n/ src/java/org/apache/cocoon/transformation/ src/webapp/WEB-INF/ src/webapp/samples/i18n/translations/ References: <20051011222909.53830.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <434C43A7.3070208@reverycodes.com> In-Reply-To: <434C43A7.3070208@reverycodes.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Torsten Curdt wrote: > >> ...shouldn't this only be changed in trunk instead of in branch? > > > IMHO, if OOMEs and severe usability issues are not fixed in branch, > then trunk won't ever be used by anybody, isn't it? > > Vadim There has got to be a typo of some sort in your statement. I'm assuming you meant one or both of the following: 1. If we keep adding stuff in the branch noone will use trunk. 2. If we don't add them in the branch then we will force people to use trunk. Both of these amount to the same thing and I don't agree. I don't have any projects "on the fence" - i.e. nothing deliverable in the next several months. If I did I would certainly go with 2.1.8. OTOH, since my projects will be early next year I am already preparing folks for the transition - upgrading to Maven 2, etc, because I want to take advantage of the packaging improvements as well as all the things that have not been ported back to 2.1. I'll use Maven as an example. Maven 1 is still in strong use with some 1.x work still going on - yet here we are focusing in on Maven 2 even though it still is in beta. Why? Because we want the features. In other words, the new features in 2.2 and the fact that we are formalizing its release will, IMO, be enough to get people to switch. If they aren't then we have completely missed the mark. Ralph