Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-79376-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 71020 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2005 17:09:23 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2005 17:09:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 65129 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2005 17:09:21 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65091 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2005 17:09:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65080 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2005 17:09:21 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:09:21 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 64.151.110.219 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of Ralph.Goers@dslextreme.com)
Received: from [64.151.110.219] (HELO mail.gosmtp.com) (64.151.110.219)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:09:23 -0700
Received: from [192.168.10.132] (adsl-66-51-196-164.dslextreme.com
 [66.51.196.164])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.gosmtp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428CADD
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <434AA028.4080403@dslextreme.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:08:56 -0700
From: Ralph Goers <Ralph.Goers@dslextreme.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Binaries for next releases
References: <B6FC50AD-4237-423D-8ACA-AB36BE6F9B04@luminas.co.uk>
 <43480559.1090205@apache.org> <589e393ae493d0381dcd589dcdc11477@apache.org>
 <434A1BB0.4070302@apache.org>
 <3255B682-206B-4EEF-9D51-044751265686@luminas.co.uk>
 <434A273E.1060502@apache.org> <434A2844.2030801@agssa.net>
 <loom.20051010T112636-300@post.gmane.org> <434A38EF.2030600@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <434A38EF.2030600@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

That is an interesting thought.  It would be nice to be able to take 
advantage of generics, the enhanced for loop and autoboxing.  But we 
need to allow running with JDK 1.4 so we could use retroweaver to allow 
that.

Ralph

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

>Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>  
>
>>Antonio Gallardo <agallardo <at> agssa.net> writes:
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Have we planned to release 2 2.2M1 version for java 1.4.x and 1.5?
>>>      
>>>
>>Is there any advantage of compiling with Java 1.5?
>>
>>    
>>
>I don't think so - just using 1.4 for compilation should be fine.
>
>Carsten
>  
>