Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of agallardo@agssa.net designates
 165.98.153.184 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <434186EF.90200@agssa.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:30:55 -0600
From: Antonio Gallardo <agallardo@agssa.net>
Organization: AG Software, S. A.
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RT] Is Cocoon Obsolete?
References: <433DB4B5.8070703@apache.org> <433FBE68.2000507@nada.kth.se>
 <dhogb0$in3$1@sea.gmane.org> <dhr3h6$a8t$1@sea.gmane.org>
 <dhr81g$n4o$1@sea.gmane.org> <dhrb82$2b1$1@sea.gmane.org>
 <dhrc2i$53l$1@sea.gmane.org> <434135A2.3070207@odoko.co.uk>
 <dhrf8p$fh1$1@sea.gmane.org>
 <d0f4176c5e20b3640ab05b3fe1ba7bde@outerthought.org>
In-Reply-To: <d0f4176c5e20b3640ab05b3fe1ba7bde@outerthought.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Steven Noels wrote:

> Now, in an environment where every committer/consultant worries about 
> his own private customers and their JDK version numbers, I wonder if 
> and when this will ever take off. In an environment where consultants 
> expect the project to care for the fact they try to make money on the 
> project, reality becomes warped.

Great comment, Steven. I feel my self direct addressed with this 
statement. Because I WASTED not only my last weekend, but a lot of time 
keeping the f*** java 1.3 compatibility. Yes, seems like it is not big 
deal for all of us. But just for the records, let me state:

"No one of my customers, employees, myself nor my family use or used 
java 1.3.x at all!"

Now, I know what this work means for other community members. Thank you 
for let me know I wasted my time, trying to keep a DAMN coontract we 
have with our user base! I will choose now to do better things with my 
weekends. Fortunately, in my country is summer the whole year!

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo.