Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87560 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2005 10:59:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2005 10:59:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 14045 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2005 10:59:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 13982 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2005 10:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 13971 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2005 10:59:12 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 03:59:12 -0700 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id 360C021C; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:58:51 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28522] - fd:aggregatefield and fd:split pattern X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20051006105851.360C021C@ajax.apache.org> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:58:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28522 ------- Additional Comments From m.pfingsthorn@hippo.nl 2005-10-06 12:58 ------- Created an attachment (id=16606) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16606&action=view) Patch for AggregateField to check if the combined value matches the split pattern The problem is twofold: 1. The validation isn't done at all (patch fixes this) 2. Only the sub fields of the aggregate field are rendered, so any validation error which is associated with the aggregate field itself has to be extracted and displayed with separately. With the patch applied, you can use to render only the validation error (if there is one). I also adapted the sample for the aggregate field to reflect this. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.