cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reinhard Poetz <reinh...@apache.org>
Subject Re: block status (was Re: ApplesProcessor - a little crazy idea)
Date Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:42:28 GMT
Ralph Goers wrote:
> Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> 
>> Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>>> I don't recall the last discussion. Obviously, if there was an 
>>> agreement nothing was done about it.
>>>
>>> Currently gump.xml only has status="value".  How do the 3 parts get 
>>> reflected into that?  How does the fact that the api is stable but 
>>> the implementation needs to be verified get presented so that we can 
>>> easily see that?
>>
>>
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/src/schema/cob-schema-1.0.xsd 
>>
>>
>> --> see the complex type "state"
> 
> 
> Right.  And then I searched for all usages of the schema and came up 
> with 2 block.xml files, neither of which specify this.
> In other words, nothing has been done about it.

Yes, we have to do it, but the procedure *how* we do it has already been defined.

-- 
Reinhard Pötz           Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach 

{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

                                        web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Mime
View raw message