cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Cocoon Fat Test
Date Fri, 07 Oct 2005 20:39:45 GMT
Leszek Gawron wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> 
>> And I agree, not having the "jx" transformer/generator in the core
>> anymore is really annoying. If you forget to include the template block
>> it breaks your application immediately. But I hope we will fix this, as
>> well.
> 
> I do not get it. It's like saying "if you forget to tank your car will 
> stop - how annoying" :). What I mean is that the same problem applies to 
> any block (i.e. forms). It's just jx and forms tend to be most "core" ones.
> 
> I think it was a good decision to move jx from core to it's own block.
> 
> It's a stupid work to customize cocoon blocks - this is the biggest 
> problem. I agree with Stefano. My local.blocks.properties should state:
> 
> exclude.all.blocks=true
> include.block.forms=true
> include.block.template=true
> 
> that's all. Someone said some time ago to use :s/#include/include. Try 
> to merge your customized local.blocks.properties with updated main 
> blocks.properties file.

Agreed. I never said it was annoying to move stuff out, I don't mind to 
have to specify what blocks to add, but I want this to be easy not a 
PITA like it is today.

My local.blocks.properties should look like Leszek wrote above. Easy and 
simple. That would make us go a long way forward.

-- 
Stefano.


Mime
View raw message