Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98653 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2005 14:41:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2005 14:41:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 65035 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2005 14:41:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 64727 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2005 14:41:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 64714 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2005 14:41:00 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 07:41:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [66.163.169.227] (HELO smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.169.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 07:41:12 -0700 Received: (qmail 54086 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2005 14:40:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.1.2?) (rossajmcd@82.31.80.188 with plain) by smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Sep 2005 14:40:55 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) In-Reply-To: References: <93FF3C31-A711-4FED-B7BB-CA571EFE3735@vnu.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <84122E3E-E41A-45C8-B176-3EFD9D9E13C6@vnu.co.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ross Mcdonald Subject: Re: flowscript in jruby Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:40:51 +0100 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, in all honesty it would depend on how integrated jruby would be, I know that jruby itself has many limitations at the moment, so initially it would be more about working with the ruby synax and various shorthand notations, if extra functionality or new ways to do things would be enabled over time though, this would make the task worthwhile I believe, I believe that choice is a good thing, so having alternative implementations helps people to work with what they like, and I certainly think Ruby has a lot to offer Cocoon, Ross. On 7 Sep 2005, at 15:11, Jorg Heymans wrote: > Ross Mcdonald wrote: > >> >> I am a long time fan of Ruby, and work with Cocoon for a living >> (at VNU >> with Pier) and hope to get a better knowledge of its inner workings, >> the prospect of working with Ruby inside Cocoon is therefore very >> interesting to me, >> > > As a flowscript user who has never seen or used Ruby : > > What are the advantages of having alternative flowscript > implementations? Does it mean we get to use cool native features of > that > particular implementation, or is it just about preferring ruby syntax > over js notation ? > > > Jorg > > ___________________________________________________________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com