Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68655 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2005 17:58:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2005 17:58:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 69458 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2005 17:58:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 69392 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2005 17:58:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 69379 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2005 17:58:12 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 10:58:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of bloritsch@d-haven.org designates 69.59.195.3 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.59.195.3] (HELO pyramid-02.kattare.com) (69.59.195.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 10:58:24 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([66.208.37.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by pyramid-02.kattare.com (8.12.10/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j88Hw3jd029972 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:58:08 -0700 Message-ID: <43207B9D.8080802@d-haven.org> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:57:49 -0400 From: Berin Loritsch User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: I took the liberty of updating the JavaDocs on the core components Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Alot of the information I documented really should have been part of the JavaDocs all along. I took the liberty of adapting what I wrote on daisy to the JavaDoc format. Even though there is a large amount of duplication now between the two resources, I still think that there is value in the documentation in daisy. The main reason being the fact that it is gathered all into one place. In the process, I did find an omission in the docs I wrote. I'll see about adapting the "Writing for Cache Performance" that Sylvain wrote.