Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99029 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2005 13:38:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2005 13:38:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 23948 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2005 13:38:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 23920 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2005 13:38:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 23907 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2005 13:38:16 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:38:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of joerg.heinicke@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.165.64.20] (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 06:38:30 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Sep 2005 13:38:13 -0000 Received: from p549D286B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.122.254]) [84.157.40.107] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 04 Sep 2005 15:38:13 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3483660 Message-ID: <431AF8C6.2090105@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 15:38:14 +0200 From: Joerg Heinicke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050728 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Event handling in form libraries References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 04.09.2005 13:16, Max Pfingsthorn wrote: > I think we shouldn't impose restrictions on the use of libraries and > specific parts of widgets within libraries. +1 same here. Why should it not be possible to reuse complete parts of the library with inner dependencies? J�rg