cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31600] - [PATCH] Caching support for XIncludes
Date Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:56:46 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31600>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31600





------- Additional Comments From oliver.powell@tvnz.co.nz  2005-09-16 04:56 -------
Jason Johnston wrote:
> Actually, no, but it shouldn't matter... the thinking is that if the source 
> file as a whole is valid then any fragments within it will also be valid.

But wouldn't that cause a cache-key clash if you had 2 different includes that
called the same source but extracted different XPath subset? Ideally these 2
results would both be cached separately.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Mime
View raw message