Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-77478-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 21291 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2005 06:50:14 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 06:50:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 55648 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2005 06:50:12 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 55592 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2005 06:50:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 55579 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2005 06:50:11 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (209.237.227.194)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:50:11 -0700
Message-ID: <43155377.90804@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:51:35 +0200
From: Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cocoon-Dev <dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Subject: [2.2] Using includes in the sitemap for components?
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>
>>Can't this be handled by wildcard inclusion from component
>>configurations in some catalog, so that we get rid of the snippet
>>insertions.
>
> <SNIP/>
>
> We can use wildcard inclusion in the main sitemap as well.
>
So what do others think? Do we want to get away of patching the main
sitemap? I think we should add an include statement for the main sitemap
that includes additional sitemap components from some directory in the
WEB-INF dir, like WEB-INF/sitemap-components/*.xconf

Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/