Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-77363-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 78723 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2005 18:46:57 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Aug 2005 18:46:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 84181 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2005 18:46:55 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 84122 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2005 18:46:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 84089 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2005 18:46:54 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (209.237.227.194)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:46:54 -0700
Message-ID: <430F63FA.9030901@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:48:26 +0200
From: Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: JUnit Tests and maven status
References: <430EECF2.60504@apache.org> <430F3C07.10100@odoko.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <430F3C07.10100@odoko.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Upayavira wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> <snip/>
> 
>>So hopefully we have next week a version that compiles the core code,
>>runs the junit tests,(on successful testing) package this into the core
>>jar and builds the webapp with the core and all jars.
>>When we have this we have to decide/plan how to continue from there. We
>>need a solution for several things, like how to deal with samples (how
>>can you exclude them etc.), how to deal with javadocs and so on.
> 
> 
> Which means that it is time to split samples into separate blocks. Then 
> you either include/exclude the sample blocks. That is really how it 
> should be, IMO.
> 
> Is it time to do this now?
> 
YES, yes, yes, big +5

Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/