Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Message-ID: <43030674.5030106@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:42:12 +0200
From: Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: CoWarp (was Re: svn commit: r232855...)
References: <BAY104-F305FF87F33F6102A42A140ADB30@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BAY104-F305FF87F33F6102A42A140ADB30@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Andrew Stevens schrieb:

> 
> Besides, wouldn't something like that justify a bigger change in version 
> number i.e. if you're going to drop it, do it in 2.2?  Also, when you do 
> drop the 1.3 support, why not drop the servlet 2.2 support as well and start 
> using standard HttpRequest/ReponseWrappers in the JSP block instead of your 
> own version?  I'd have thought any app server that supports 1.4+ would also 
> support servlet 2.3+.  Plus, I've already had to write a custom JSPEngine 
> implementation because Websphere won't do includes if the request isn't the 
> standard wrapper class...
> 
With 2.2 we alreay drop 1.3 support and servlet 2.2 support.
You're right with using the wrappers, so can you post a patch please or
can someone pick this up?

Carsten


-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/