Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68541 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2005 09:29:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2005 09:29:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 60310 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2005 09:29:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 60275 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2005 09:29:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 60262 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2005 09:29:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:29:20 -0700 Message-ID: <4301B23E.6060007@apache.org> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:30:38 +0200 From: Carsten Ziegeler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [Cocoon Docs] Website documentation update - portal first References: <43008F44.8010508@gmail.com> <43009400.3070709@apache.org> <43009C11.1070209@gmail.com> <4300A6A2.1040706@apache.org> <4300B080.3030509@gmail.com> <4300B393.5070908@odoko.co.uk> <43018C56.9070800@apache.org> <4301AEEC.1090501@odoko.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4301AEEC.1090501@odoko.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Upayavira wrote: > > Can you remember where these differences occur? In what pages? I'd like > to look at how it is now - I've a feeling I may have edited the pages to > account for this, but would like to see what is actually the case. > Hmm, actually now - there were several. I think I searched through the docs for Component, ComponentManager, Composable, RoleManager, LogKitManager, LoggerManager and all the instrumentation stuff. All of this is not available anymore in trunk. What about checking out the last version of the docs from trunk and comparing them to 2.1.x? Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/