Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92369 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2005 20:02:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2005 20:02:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 24682 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2005 20:02:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 24598 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2005 20:02:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 24481 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2005 20:02:17 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:02:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of joerg.heinicke@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.165.64.20] (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:02:40 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Aug 2005 20:02:15 -0000 Received: from p549D4080.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.122.254]) [84.157.64.128] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 08 Aug 2005 22:02:15 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3483660 Message-ID: <42F7BA5B.10306@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 22:02:35 +0200 From: Joerg Heinicke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050728 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Suggestion for XHTMLSerializer References: <1123067609.7378.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42F3AC2F.4080307@gmx.de> <42F48BAF.3010808@gmx.de> <42F4FE1D.3050704@lojjic.net> <42F5477E.4040301@lojjic.net> <42F5E165.1090700@gmx.de> <42F62F0F.3030306@gmx.de> <42F64E31.8050002@gmx.de> <42F7B2DF.5090004@reverycodes.com> In-Reply-To: <42F7B2DF.5090004@reverycodes.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 08.08.2005 21:30, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >>> Completely wrong. If you find a 1:1 relation between a svg and a >>> bitmap, go >>> ahead man, you're rich. For me a svg serialization is not reversible, >>> you >>> loose layers, labels, structure and of course scalability. >> >> Man, 1:1 does not mean that you can go in both directions! > > > You just proved Eric's point. In which way? > Moreover, I don't see why go all religious > on simple and (as it seems) useful idea of XSLSerializer. We do have > FOP, Batik, etc serializers - why not Trax. I don't see how they compare. Furthermore there were reasons for not using xsl:output information, but putting it into serializer component declaration. Shall they no longer be valid? Joerg