cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org>
Subject Re: CoWarp (was Re: svn commit: r232855...)
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:23:53 GMT
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:

> 
> Thinking further about it, I completely agree about that we have to many 
> blocks rigth now. But that is not an argument against adding more, 
> rather about removing or at least make optional, blocks that lacks 
> community support. You might remember 
> http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/BlockStatusPoll.
> 
> We could add more blocks, but it has to be based on community interest 
> or involvement, not like some of the abandoned one man shows from our past.
> 
With CoWarp and flow and jxtg we could think about removing (deprecating
first of course)
the authentication-fw and the session-fw block.


-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

Mime
View raw message