cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Fagerstrom <>
Subject Re: [RT] The impact of using OSGi
Date Tue, 09 Aug 2005 22:14:44 GMT
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Le 25 juil. 05, à 12:20, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
>> Hmm, I'm a little bit confused if I compare the two response quoted 
>> below.
>> I personally would prefer to go the block.xml way and create OSGi
>> manifests and whatever out of it. With that approach we are still
>> independent from OSGi...
>  From the discussions last week with Reinhard, Daniel and Upayavira I 
> think using block.xml to generate everything else was the consensus. See 
> "role of block.xml" in

Hmm, was I really part of that concensus? Like Sylvain I prefer to use 
the OSGi manifest for everything that can be described by that and the 
block.xml for the rest.

Now, IIUC, the rest of you think that such a solution would be 
unpractical because of overlap with gump, compile and deploy time 
dependency descriptors etc. You might very well be right about that, but 
I prefer to wait and see until we actually start to implement it before 
we decide.


View raw message