cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RT] The impact of using OSGi
Date Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:20:27 GMT
Hmm, I'm a little bit confused if I compare the two response quoted below.

I personally would prefer to go the block.xml way and create OSGi
manifests and whatever out of it. With that approach we are still
independent from OSGi.

Carsten

>>BTW, what is the status about the dependency definition (block.xml).
>>What are we planning to use?

Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> 
> A lot of what's was planned to be in block.xml is already defined by the 
> OSGi bundle manifest file. So it will be stripped-down to keep only what 
> is specific to Cocoon blocks.
> 
Upayavira wrote:
> Just replying to this bit - Daniel showed me the block.xml before he
> left ApacheCon. It looks pretty simple. Also, given all the other
> 'dependency' files we will/might need (gump.xml, manifest, maven project
> files, etc) in a discussion it was suggested that we're better of
> sticking with our own blocks.xml file - we can always generate anything
> else we want from that.
>
> So, AFAICS, blokc.xml stays as Stefano proposed it.
>
-- 
Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/

Mime
View raw message