Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <42BB35BB.2010009@odoko.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:20:43 +0100
From: Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk>
Organization: Odoko Ltd
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Official presence for cocoon zones?
References: <06b71311adc6987fca36bee17b33a868@wrinkledog.com>
In-Reply-To: <06b71311adc6987fca36bee17b33a868@wrinkledog.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Mark Lundquist wrote:
> If http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/ is the future of Cocoon 
> documentation, shouldn't cocoon.apache.org be updated to mention it?  
> The wiki is currently mentioned under the "Documentation" section on the 
> front page of c.a.o and in the sidebar.
> 
> Also, the front page of the Wiki should be updated too, no?  It still 
> gives the impression that it is the documentation staging area (same w/ 
> the "About" page).  It should change to communicate its new role, and 
> refer people to the Daisy site for documentation purposes?

Well, really, cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy should never be drawn 
attention to. It is the place where our documentation will be edited, 
but not where it will be published. It will be published on 
cocoon.apache.org. So, it is really cocoon.apache.org that we need to 
continue to draw attention to.

At the same time, we want to draw people into helping improve the 
documentation (without more people, it could become just another dead 
duck). So we perhaps need to draw attention to it from that perspective 
- where you go to help us improve our documentation, but definitely not 
as a definitive source of content.

Make sense?

Regards, Upayavira