Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10383 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2005 10:24:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2005 10:24:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 69874 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2005 10:23:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 69707 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2005 10:23:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 69681 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2005 10:23:53 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from odoko.co.uk (HELO odoko.co.uk) (80.68.92.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 03:23:52 -0700 Received: from host-84-9-42-226.bulldogdsl.com ([84.9.42.226] helo=[10.0.0.3]) by odoko.co.uk with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DirhB-0002mj-2i; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:34:01 +0100 Message-ID: <42B152F9.6030004@odoko.co.uk> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:22:49 +0100 From: Upayavira Organization: Odoko Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org, general@gump.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][Gump] your definitions break Gump builds References: <87vf4e63gi.fsf@www.samaflost.de> In-Reply-To: <87vf4e63gi.fsf@www.samaflost.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefan, I've committed this patch to Cocoon trunk. I presume that is the correct place. Regards, Upayavira Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all, > > your own project definitions of commons-javaflow, commons-jci and > lately spring break the Gump supplied definitions. > > We've been building svn trunk of commons-jci for weeks now, but it > gets listed as failed because it doesn't produce a jar with "your" > name. > > spring is an installed package and has been for quite some time, even > before you added a defintion. > > The appendend patch simply removes the three project definitions, if > this is not the correct way to deal with it, please at least rename > your projects. > > Also, in the case of jci and javaflow, this is a repeated request, see > . > Please let me know if I'm not following the correct protocol here. > > Cheers > > Stefan > > Index: gump.xml > =================================================================== > --- gump.xml (revision 190800) > +++ gump.xml (working copy) > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ > | > | $Id$ > | > - | see http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/buildLog.html > + | see http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/buildLog.html > | for already existing projects > | > +--> > @@ -1530,18 +1530,6 @@ > > > > - > - org.apache.commons.javaflow > - > - > - > - > - > - org.apache.jci > - > - > - > - > > javax.jcr > > @@ -1553,8 +1541,4 @@ > > > > - > - org.springframework > - > - > >