Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92414 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2005 07:05:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2005 07:05:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 35614 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2005 07:05:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 35504 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2005 07:05:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 35480 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2005 07:05:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from odoko.co.uk (HELO odoko.co.uk) (80.68.92.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 00:05:13 -0700 Received: from elfriedeholmes.demon.co.uk ([80.177.165.206] helo=[10.0.0.3]) by odoko.co.uk with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DepKK-00080w-Ah for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 08:13:44 +0100 Message-ID: <42A2A41D.7010205@odoko.co.uk> Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 08:05:01 +0100 From: Upayavira Organization: Odoko Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [Docs] A proposed revision, four weeks for Cocoon, and a smattering of Julie Andrews References: <694433862586d3fb40f41a3aaf8b8565@efurbishment.com> <42A065D6.8080602@odoko.co.uk> <42A069DC.2040604@apache.org> <42A0701E.7060809@apache.org> <42A070E7.9030200@odoko.co.uk> <42A07470.6010902@apache.org> <42A0C279.3010604@odoko.co.uk> <42A14E4D.70207@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <42A14E4D.70207@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Reinhard Poetz wrote: > Upayavira wrote: > >> Well, given Steven is working on setting up Daisy right now, I think >> we might need that. How much change would our SVN repo require to make >> 0.7 work? > > > AFAIK our repositories build fine with Forrest 0.7. The person doing the > conversion of the docs into the format required by Daisy should have a > look at the project sitemap where he will find some pipelines that > should be helpful. Including the 2.1 ones? Upayavira