cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Lundquist>
Subject Re: Marking cforms stable in 2.1.8
Date Tue, 07 Jun 2005 07:49:30 GMT

On Jun 6, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:

> We have a project that needs to use a forms framework that is more 
> advanced than what SimpleForms provides.  However, it is difficult on 
> selling cforms simply because they are marked unstable.  What is it 
> going to take to mark it stable in 2.1.8?  Can we simply identify the 
> known bugs in bugzilla and mark it stable?

I don't know what's going on with your group, but the problem may be 
that we define "unstable" = "API subject to change", but the word 
"unstable" has other connotations, e.g. "broken", "alpha", "not ready 
for prime-time" (also "prone to undergo a spontaneous nuclear decay 
reaction" :-).

Why don't we just

1)  take everything currently marked "stable", and re-badge those as 

2) take forms, and anything else like it, and mark it as "stable"!

I.e., redefine "stable" to mean what average people think it means.


View raw message