cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Upayavira ...@odoko.co.uk>
Subject Re: [Docs] A proposed revision, four weeks for Cocoon, and a smattering of Julie Andrews
Date Fri, 03 Jun 2005 20:50:01 GMT
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Upayavira wrote:
> 
>> Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Upayavira wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  * This will mean that the end result will be xdocs, not HTML. 
>>>>> However,
>>>>>    I don't believe converting HTML to xdocs would be hard, and I'd
>>>>>    happily knock up a script to do any necessary conversions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> actually Forrest already does this
>>>>
>>>
>>> 0.6 does work with HTML, but you have to rename the files to *.ehtml 
>>> in order to have them skinned
>>>
>>> Forrest 0.7-dev will work happily with most HTML docs without any 
>>> kind of modification (anything it doesn't handle well is an oversight 
>>> so we will patch for it).
>>>
>>> What version of Forrest does Cocoon currently work with. It is not a 
>>> major step to upgrade to 0.7 if necessary.
>>
>>
>>
>> I believe we're now at 0.6 (ish).
> 
> 
> OK, 0.7 is in the final stages of development, we are just tidying up 
> before the release. If you find the need to upgrade I will offer my 
> assistance (you will have to upgrade in order to pull docuements from 
> external sources like Daisy as that is part of the new plugin system).

Well, given Steven is working on setting up Daisy right now, I think we 
might need that. How much change would our SVN repo require to make 0.7 
work?

Regards, Upayavira

Mime
View raw message