cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Fagerstrom <dani...@nada.kth.se>
Subject Re: Logkit jvadocs
Date Wed, 01 Jun 2005 14:03:23 GMT
Antonio Gallardo wrote:

>On Mar, 31 de Mayo de 2005, 13:53, Daniel Fagerstrom dijo:
>  
>
>>Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>><snip/>
>>    
>>
>>>IMHO, that means Logkit is dead.
>>>
>>>Is time to moving setup log4j as our default logging package.
>>>
>>>Is that OK?
>>>      
>>>
>>Antonio,
>>
>>Logkit has been dead for quite some time and we have long discussions
>>about changing logging package a couple of times every year. The last
>>one is here:
>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110492559400004&r=1&w=2
>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110509059400003&r=1&w=2
>>
>>Are there any new facts? Have anybody changed his/her mind since last
>>time?
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks Daniel.
>
>Rereading the threads above shows that we know we need to replace Logkit.
>Even Avalon wanted to do that sometime ago, the problem in the threads was
>we were unable to choose the succesor of Logkit.
>
>Now we are 5 months later. I think it is enough time, I believe some
>people changed his mind in this time.
>
>Should I start this discussion again?
>  
>
Would be hard to stop you I guess ;)

Could you write a summary of the main issues and solution suggestions 
from that thread? So that we don't need to repeat that discussion again.

/Daniel


Mime
View raw message