Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17387 invoked from network); 25 May 2005 10:37:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 May 2005 10:37:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 85188 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2005 10:36:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 85121 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2005 10:36:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 85105 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2005 10:36:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of skounis@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.201 as permitted sender) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2005 03:36:54 -0700 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c16so58977rne for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 03:36:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=R/rol4Cac4sLp9v8g1IpiFu9LHgAgqEd3VE4i3HKHfZ/YvXqJBiZRizOzCXgTmFunToKfb5bsHCNX5/IHqoQVYAytkF1ytdTLrhAQlvr7Psqbqu4C+h1PPbtxuah2iNqvnJLe20EWyoi8fDx8YxI2/7jW59+n8MpsmI0ilej6CA= Received: by 10.38.13.64 with SMTP id 64mr511301rnm; Wed, 25 May 2005 03:36:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.39.1.26 with HTTP; Wed, 25 May 2005 03:36:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 13:36:52 +0300 From: Stavros Kounis Reply-To: Stavros Kounis To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Planet Cocoon license and reuse of docs In-Reply-To: <329A68716B57D54E8D39FD3F8A4A84DF01AAF606@um-mail0136.unimaas.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <329A68716B57D54E8D39FD3F8A4A84DF01AAF606@um-mail0136.unimaas.nl> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N i totally agree with you Helma. the content is that matter. I think that they are many people around here that can do the dirty job to create well formed files (xml, xhtml, etc) but few that can write documentation. I don't have check yet what you have do until know with Steven/Daisy but even wiki is enough if someone want to "produce" content. Of course I'm not against anyone that want to develop a full featured "doc" system. regards --stavros On 5/25/05, Linden H van der (MI) wrote: > Guys, >=20 > with all due respect for the various efforts to improve the > documentation, there is only one way to improvement and that is > screening all the available documentation on validity and clarity and > rewrite/enhance it when it's lacking or write the missing pieces. This > screening process is something that HAS to be done by hand, there is > nothing to automate about. > If you want people to participate in this tedious but very important job > the only tools you need is some kind of repository for the "new" > documentation, a (team of) editor(s) that supervise the work and decide > on the quality of the content and the organisation of it and, most of > all, EASY and QUICK access to an editor that produces the documentation > in an acceptable form. >=20 > Don't bother writing YANDT (Yet Another Nifty Documentation Tool) but > look at what's available and use THAT. If all the time spent on writing > posts here ABOUT the documentation had instead been spent on WRITING > documentation, we would have had the best documented project on the > planet. >=20 > I look at all this from a documentation writer's point of view and I > repeat what I've said before: give me easy tools that produce documents > in a format that can easily be transformed into anything you guys dream > up to be handy, but most of all don't take ages to setup/startup and > don't need a 50-page user manual. >=20 > For now the only thing I've found that meets MY criteria is Daisy and > since Steven has already granted me some workspace I've started there. > True, this will not be the ultimate destination and yes, it might have > some drawbacks, but it works! >=20 > Let me propose an entirely different strategy: >=20 > - pick a tool, any tool that meets the criteria I mentioned above and > start a new set of documentation there. I suggest Daisy. >=20 > - everyone who wants to write documentation should use THAT tool, that > repository to write his or her document. Let's call this person a > writer. Before doing the actual writing we ask the writer to verify if > there is nothing on his topic in either wiki or 'official > documentation'. If there is, the writer should use the information there > and add it to the document. >=20 > - there are several committers that are also concerned about the > documentation and make themselves heard in every thread about the topic. > You guys know the code best and each probably has his own field of > expertise. > What I would suggest is that you volunteer to be editor/reviewer in your > field of expertise. Your task in the documentation project will be to > review. So, the document written by a 'writer' is reviewed to see if the > document is valid (i.e. the information is correct and current). If you > feel something is missing you can either add it yourself of mark it for > the original writer to add (based on time constraints). When both of you > agree on the document it goes 'public', i.e. visible/usable for the rest > of the community. >=20 > When a document goes public and it includes information from the wiki > and/or the 'official documentation' the editor replaces those pages with > a link to the new document. >=20 >=20 > I know in an open source community there are not much 'rules' to be > enforced, but if you can set up rules for committing code, you might as > well set up rules for committing documentation. >=20 >=20 > just my 2 ct. >=20 > Bye, Helma >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgardler@apache.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, 25 May, 2005 01:11 > > To: dev@cocoon.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Planet Cocoon license and reuse of docs > > > > > > Upayavira wrote: > > > Antonio Gallardo wrote: > > > > ... > > > > >> With the new apache zones, I think there is posible in a rasonable > > >> amount of time (hours?) to setup a CMS to do the job. > > >> > > >> WDYT? > > > > > > > > > Then someone should do it, and we will see where that takes us. I'll > > > volunteer for the part of doing any document conversions > > that might be > > > required. > > > > I intend to do some experimentation over at Forrest with Daisy as the > > CMS once we have Forrest 0.7 released (very soon now). > > > > In the meantime, I will continue to work with PlanetCocoon and other > > such initiatives (the Wiki for exmample) to allow any content they > > create to be incorporated into the Cocoon docs, and to provide a link > > back to the relevant "host" CMS. > > > > When we have a working demo the Cocoon community can decide > > if they want > > to use it. > > > > Ross > > >=20 --=20 Stavros Kounis Osmosis networks & consulting http://tools.osmosis.gr/blog http://www.osmosis.gr