Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-74265-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67673 invoked from network); 13 May 2005 11:25:34 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2005 11:25:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 44797 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2005 11:29:43 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 44635 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2005 11:29:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 44577 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2005 11:29:41 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from cedar.ugent.be (HELO cedar.UGent.be) (157.193.49.14)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 May 2005 04:29:41 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by cedar.UGent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AD5193632
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:25:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cedar.UGent.be ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bonobo.UGent.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 01236-07 for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>;
 Fri, 13 May 2005 13:25:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (otsrv1.iic.ugent.be [157.193.121.51])
	by cedar.UGent.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8463C193624
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:25:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.123.115] (host115 [192.168.123.115])
	by otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j4DBPH223192
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Fri, 13 May 2005 13:25:17 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
In-Reply-To: <428481C0.90604@apache.org>
References: <2f44faadc4a27ef74ba7ef13b742cdd9@efurbishment.com>
 <a753b7f80505111823427a3c80@mail.gmail.com> <4282C5DE.5040709@apache.org>
 <200505121223.33206.niclas@hedhman.org>
 <a753b7f8050511213359da5487@mail.gmail.com>
 <e38fc1bf22999829fcaaca03e496d1eb@apache.org>
 <5bd9371a02665db32b5af57b59dded1d@efurbishment.com>
 <4283748F.9090301@apache.org>
 <cad9f12c677dce4704354dcbbf334261@outerthought.org>
 <428481C0.90604@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <a3b09b730874b3d6382d0b24ad3af5c2@outerthought.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steven Noels <stevenn@outerthought.org>
Subject: Re: Forrest & Daisy integration scenarios
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 13:25:46 +0200
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
X-Virus-Scanned: by UGent DICT
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On 13 May 2005, at 12:30, Sylvain Wallez wrote:

> IMO the problem is more political or sentimental than technical.

Yes, and that's why I won't push. But I'm feeling our pain.

> Note that I don't question the value of Daisy nor the good intentions 
> of you OT folks, but I want to point out the non-technical problems. 
> We may also question ourselves about using Lenya.

I believe there are no other points than non-technical ones.

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML            An Orixo Member
Read my weblog at            http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org