Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90167 invoked from network); 31 May 2005 13:53:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 May 2005 13:53:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 88350 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2005 13:53:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 88325 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2005 13:53:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 88311 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2005 13:53:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 06:53:31 -0700 Received: (qmail 90019 invoked from network); 31 May 2005 13:53:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 31 May 2005 13:53:17 -0000 Message-ID: <429C6CAC.5040800@apache.org> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:54:52 +0200 From: Carsten Ziegeler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: NPE in OJB block [was Re: svn commit: r177968 - in /cocoon: blocks/unsupported/ojb/trunk/java/org/apache/cocoon/ojb/c] References: <20050523125718.87041.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <4291D426.3030008@apache.org> <429AF13B.7050808@apache.org> <429C67C8.7000401@reverycodes.com> In-Reply-To: <429C67C8.7000401@reverycodes.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: 127.0.0.1 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > >>Noone? > > > Is on my list... Great :) > Probably issue is related to the ordering of component > instantiation. > Yeah, I guess so as well, I was wondering why a static variable is required anyway. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/