Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73384 invoked from network); 26 May 2005 12:16:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 May 2005 12:16:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 32954 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2005 12:16:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 32668 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2005 12:16:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 32654 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2005 12:16:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (HELO smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com) (217.12.11.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Thu, 26 May 2005 05:16:19 -0700 Received: (qmail 33110 invoked from network); 26 May 2005 12:16:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.31?) (reinhard?poetz@62.178.239.20 with plain) by smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 May 2005 12:16:16 -0000 Message-ID: <4295BE0E.9070607@apache.org> Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 14:16:14 +0200 From: Reinhard Poetz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Other default cocoon resources References: <1d10631f5178817e14fc17106e423aae@apache.org> <42959FD3.6080703@apache.org> <4295B331.9020905@mobilebox.pl> <4295B604.9070307@nada.kth.se> In-Reply-To: <4295B604.9070307@nada.kth.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > Leszek Gawron wrote: > >> Reinhard Poetz wrote: >> >>> Should we move the stylesheets >> >> >> I would help a lot to be able to deploy cocoon with no additional >> files at all. What do you say if we moved cocoon logo and default >> stylesheets (the ones styling error pages etc.) to some jar (either >> existing or a new one)? > > > A new one. IMO we should move away from the monolitic thinking and start > to think in terms of pluggins/bundles/blocks. Making the minimal Cocoon > really lean would help using it embeded in new and innovative contexts, > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=111366405100002&r=1&w=2. > >> This way we can have cocoon that consists of: >> - bunch of .jar files >> - web.xml which hardly changes >> - a set of .xconf and logkit files. > > > +1 > >> It's a pity we cannot move .xconf files into jars. > > > Why can't we? theoretically we can but soon we will have .cob files that *are* single files. So for now *I* wouldn't invest too much work. -- Reinhard P�tz Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach {Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon} web(log): http://www.poetz.cc -------------------------------------------------------------------- ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de