Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20573 invoked from network); 24 May 2005 21:17:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 May 2005 21:17:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 90701 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2005 21:17:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 90621 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2005 21:17:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 90604 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2005 21:17:09 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from odoko.co.uk (HELO odoko.co.uk) (80.68.92.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2005 14:17:07 -0700 Received: from elfriedeholmes.demon.co.uk ([80.177.165.206] helo=[10.0.0.3]) by odoko.co.uk with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DagsM-0002hu-Jz for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:23:46 +0100 Message-ID: <429399BC.6000109@odoko.co.uk> Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:16:44 +0100 From: Upayavira Organization: Odoko Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Planet Cocoon license and reuse of docs References: <42926BDD.5030307@apache.org> <4292F581.9070806@apache.org> <50426dde3ead00eaad8f0134d59071b7@apache.org> <4293198C.4090806@apache.org> <4293451B.0@apache.org> <42934F48.9030807@apache.org> <4293902F.80908@apache.org> <429391B7.9090805@odoko.co.uk> <45972.10.0.0.1.1116969279.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> In-Reply-To: <45972.10.0.0.1.1116969279.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Antonio Gallardo wrote: > On Mar, 24 de Mayo de 2005, 15:42, Upayavira dijo: > >>Sylvain Wallez wrote: >> >>>Sebastien Arbogast wrote: >>> >>> >>>>The second important thing I notice in your remark is the argument >>>>that people here know Cocoon but not PHP. But it's exactly our point : >>>>we don't think Cocoon documentation should remain between Cocoon >>>>developers and that's also why we chose a PHP based CMS : because >>>>people are used to it, to its structures, to its customs. Right now >>>>it's much more natural than any Cocoon-based solution. We consider >>>>that documentation should not be written by developers and read by >>>>users... everybody should be able to participate in the same effort >>>>according to its own skills. >>>> >>>>Last but not least, our objective is precisely to make documentation >>>>writing completely independent from the unerlying technologies, so >>>>nobody should need to know neither Cocoon nor PHP to write >>>>documentation (yes a little bit of Cocoon should be useful if one >>>>wants his content to be useful but... you got my point) >>>> >>>> >>> >>>I'm sorry, but this is plain bullshit blabla to ease the pain of not >>>using our own dog food. >>> >>>Cocoon is used by some huge content management systems all over the >>>world. And it wouldn't be suitable to manage its own docs? People will >>>laugh at us and go away. >>> >>>Sorry, I currently lack time to read this thread in full details, as I'm >>>currently giving a Cocoon training to people writing a huge >>>document/content management system... with Cocoon. >> >>Yes, but is it the job of someone who is interested in writing docs to >>actually write a CMS at the same time? This seems like a bit much to ask. >> >>If someone else can offer an existing CMS that has the features they >>need, and can be installed and operational within a reasonable amount of >>time, then we'd be asking different questions. > > > With the new apache zones, I think there is posible in a rasonable amount > of time (hours?) to setup a CMS to do the job. > > WDYT? Then someone should do it, and we will see where that takes us. I'll volunteer for the part of doing any document conversions that might be required. Regards, Upayavira